Written by Travis S. Kelley

Construction sites are some of the most legally complicated places in Texas when something goes wrong. Multiple companies occupy the same ground — general contractors, subcontractors, equipment vendors, property developers — and when a worker or bystander gets hurt, sorting out who is actually responsible requires untangling a web of contracts, duties, and statutes. I’ve handled construction accident claims in Austin for years, and one thing I can tell you with certainty: most injured workers significantly underestimate how many parties may be legally liable for what happened to them.

This post addresses the questions I hear most often from clients who’ve been hurt on Texas job sites — questions that don’t have simple yes-or-no answers, but do have actionable ones. At Kelley Wolff Injury Attorneys | Austin Accident Lawyers, we represent people who’ve suffered everything from broken bones to traumatic brain injuries to amputations because someone on a job site cut corners. If any of the scenarios below sounds familiar, keep reading.

—

Can I Sue a General Contractor If a Subcontractor’s Negligence Caused My Construction Injury in Austin?

Yes — in many cases you can. Texas law doesn’t automatically shield a general contractor from liability just because the immediate cause of your injury was a subcontractor’s mistake. The key question courts ask is whether the general contractor retained control over the work that caused the harm.

Under Texas common law, a general contractor who exercises actual control over the methods, means, or safety of subcontractor work can be held directly liable for injuries that result from negligence in that work. This principle comes from cases interpreting the “retained control” doctrine. If a GC’s superintendent was directing how a roofing sub’s crew set up scaffolding, for instance, and the scaffolding failed, the GC’s control over that activity makes them a viable defendant. Courts also look at whether the GC had the contractual right to stop work, required compliance with specific safety measures, or assigned supervisors to monitor subcontractor activity — all of which tend to establish that retained control.

There’s a second theory worth knowing: negligent hiring or supervision of a subcontractor. If a general contractor hired a sub they knew — or should have known — had a poor safety record or lacked proper licensing, that’s independent negligence on the GC’s part, separate from whatever the sub actually did wrong.

From a practical standpoint, job site documentation matters enormously here. Safety meeting sign-in sheets, daily logs, site superintendent communications, and subcontract agreements all go into building this kind of case. When I investigate a construction site injury, those documents are among the first things I request. The Bureau of Labor Statistics consistently shows that construction is one of the highest-risk industries for fatal and nonfatal injuries, and a large percentage of those incidents involve multi-party job sites where control disputes become the central legal question.

One important note for workers: if you’re employed by the subcontractor, workers’ compensation may be your exclusive remedy against your direct employer. But the general contractor is typically a third party for workers’ comp purposes, which means suing them is not barred by the comp system. That third-party claim can be filed alongside a workers’ comp claim — and pursuing both is often the right move.

—

Can I Sue a Construction Equipment Manufacturer If Their Product Caused My Job Site Injury?

You can, and these cases can be some of the most valuable construction accident claims we handle. Texas follows strict products liability law, which means an equipment manufacturer can be held liable if a product was defectively designed, defectively manufactured, or lacked adequate safety warnings — even if the manufacturer wasn’t present at the job site.

Consider a concrete saw with a blade guard that fails under normal operating conditions, or a skid steer with a rollover protection system that doesn’t meet published safety standards. If those defects cause an injury, the manufacturer is potentially liable regardless of how the equipment was used or who owned it at the time.

These cases require expert analysis. A mechanical engineer or industrial safety expert typically needs to examine the equipment, review the product’s design specifications, and compare those specs against industry standards like those published by OSHA or voluntary standards bodies. Preservation of the equipment is critical — if the machine is repaired, modified, or scrapped before a lawyer can get an expert to look at it, you may lose your best evidence.

In my experience, equipment manufacturers often argue that the product was misused or modified after sale. That defense sometimes has merit, but often it’s a litigation tactic. We push back hard by documenting the condition of the equipment immediately after the incident and by tracing its maintenance and modification history through service records.

Distributors and rental companies can also be defendants in these cases. If a company rented out equipment that was known to be in disrepair, Texas courts have found them liable under negligent entrustment and products liability theories.

—

Can I Sue a Property Developer If Their Construction Project in Austin Caused My Injury?

Property developers can be liable under several legal theories, particularly when they have retained control over the project site or when they have contractually assumed responsibility for safety conditions.

Some developers take a hands-off approach — they hire a general contractor and step away. Others stay actively involved: they attend weekly safety meetings, direct site access, control sequencing of trades, or issue directives that affect how work is performed. The more involved a developer is, the stronger the retained-control argument becomes. Texas courts have found that a developer who requires specific construction methods or schedules that create dangerous conditions can be liable when those conditions cause harm.

There’s also a premises liability angle. A developer who owns or controls the land on which construction is happening owes a duty to keep conditions reasonably safe for workers who are lawfully present. If a developer knew about a dangerous subsurface condition, for example — an unstable soil formation that a subcontractor’s crew didn’t know about — and failed to disclose or remediate it, that’s actionable premises liability in Texas.

Austin has seen substantial development pressure over the past decade, with large mixed-use and residential projects moving fast. Tight schedules and cost pressures create exactly the conditions where corners get cut. I’ve seen injury cases where a developer’s demand to “maintain the schedule” directly contributed to workers being put in unsafe situations. That kind of evidence — an email, a meeting note, a directive from a developer’s project manager — can be decisive.

—

Can I Recover for a Traumatic Brain Injury Caused by a Construction Accident in Austin?

Yes, and TBI claims are among the most serious construction accident cases we handle. Head injuries from falls, falling objects, or machinery impacts on job sites can range from concussions that clear up in weeks to severe TBIs that permanently alter a person’s ability to work, communicate, or live independently.

The CDC has long tracked TBI as a leading cause of death and disability in the United States, and construction workers face elevated risk from falls and struck-by incidents. A TBI claim in Texas can include compensation for medical expenses — past and future — lost wages, diminished earning capacity, pain and suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life. Severe TBI cases often involve life care planners who project decades of future medical costs.

What I caution clients about is the tendency to undervalue a TBI case early on. Symptoms like cognitive fog, personality changes, sleep disruption, and chronic headaches don’t always show up dramatically on initial imaging. A worker might be discharged from an ER with a “mild” TBI diagnosis but develop serious long-term consequences. Neuropsychological testing, sometimes months after the injury, is often what documents the true scope of impairment. Johns Hopkins Medicine and the Mayo Clinic both provide well-established frameworks for understanding TBI severity and long-term outcomes that we routinely reference when working with medical experts.

Texas law also allows family members to pursue claims for loss of consortium when a TBI permanently changes a person’s ability to function as a spouse or parent. Those claims have real value and should not be overlooked.

—

Can a Construction Worker Sue for a Trench Collapse Injury in Austin, Texas?

Trench collapses are among the most preventable construction deaths, and yet they keep happening. OSHA’s excavation standard — 29 CFR 1926 Subpart P — is explicit about protective systems required for trenches deeper than five feet. When those requirements are ignored and a collapse occurs, the evidence of negligence is often sitting right there in the OSHA citation.

A worker injured in a trench collapse may have claims against their employer through workers’ compensation, and claims against the general contractor, the site owner, or a safety subcontractor as third parties. In Texas, employers who fail to carry workers’ comp insurance — and many smaller construction contractors do not — can be sued directly without the comp system as a bar. The Texas Department of Insurance maintains rules around workers’ compensation opt-outs that create additional legal exposure for non-subscribing employers.

Trench collapses frequently cause crush injuries, spinal cord damage, and fatalities. The victims who survive often face months of recovery and permanent physical limitations. OSHA investigates most fatal trench collapses and issues publicly available reports that can be valuable to a civil case. We routinely pull those records and use OSHA’s own findings as supporting evidence.

From a practical standpoint, do not wait to contact a lawyer if you or someone you know has been in a trench collapse. Physical evidence at the collapse site degrades quickly, and the job site may be remediated or altered before an expert can inspect it. Prompt action is not just helpful — it’s often decisive.

—

Can I Recover for an Amputation or Crushing Injury Caused by a Construction Machine in Austin?

Amputation and crush injuries from construction equipment rank among the most catastrophic outcomes a worker can experience. Losses of fingers, hands, arms, feet, and legs happen in seconds — typically from unguarded machinery, caught-in/between incidents, or failures in lockout/tagout procedures.

Texas law allows full compensatory damages for these injuries: medical treatment, prosthetics and assistive devices, vocational rehabilitation, lost earning capacity for the remainder of a person’s working life, and non-economic damages for pain, disfigurement, and loss of enjoyment of life. Amputation cases often settle for significant amounts because the permanence and visibility of the injury are undeniable. But “settle” doesn’t mean “take the first offer.” Insurance companies routinely low-ball initial offers on catastrophic injury cases, betting that a badly injured person needs money quickly.

Crush injuries, even when limbs are preserved, can result in compartment syndrome, permanent nerve damage, chronic pain, and complex regional pain syndrome — conditions that require years of treatment and can be as functionally disabling as an amputation. NIH research on long-term outcomes for crush injury survivors documents just how significant the lasting effects can be.

On the liability side, machinery that causes an amputation or crush injury frequently has a products liability component. Guarding requirements for construction equipment are well-established under OSHA and ANSI standards. If a machine had no guard or a guard that had been disabled, the manufacturer, the equipment owner, and the employer may all have exposure. FindLaw provides a solid overview of how products liability and negligence theories interact in machinery injury cases, and Justia offers access to Texas case law on the topic for those wanting to go deeper.

We also look closely at the employer’s safety training records and equipment maintenance logs. A pattern of prior incidents with the same machine, or evidence that workers were never trained on its safe operation, can support a punitive damages claim in cases of gross negligence under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code §41.003.

—

What You Should Do After a Serious Construction Injury in Texas?

The steps you take in the days after a construction injury directly affect the strength of any claim you may have. Seek emergency medical care first — but beyond that, try to preserve everything. Photograph the scene before anything is moved or repaired. Get names and contact information for witnesses. Don’t sign anything an insurance company or employer puts in front of you without legal review. And don’t give a recorded statement to any insurer before speaking with a lawyer.

Texas has a two-year statute of limitations for most personal injury claims under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code §16.003. That sounds like plenty of time, but evidence disappears fast on construction sites. Equipment gets repaired or sold. Video footage from site cameras gets overwritten. Witnesses move on to other jobs. Starting the investigation early isn’t just better — it’s often the difference between a provable case and one that can’t be won.

Our team handles the full range of Austin workplace accident claims, including construction cases involving brain injuries, spinal cord damage, amputations, crush injuries, and wrongful death. You can learn more about our experience and approach on the firm website. We also represent clients across Texas in personal injury matters and wrongful death claims.

—

Talk to a Construction Accident Attorney Before Making Any Decisions

Construction accident claims are not straightforward, and the difference between recovering fair compensation and walking away with nothing often comes down to the quality of early legal work. Multiple defendants, complex liability theories, aggressive insurance defense teams, and time-sensitive evidence all make these cases demanding. You should not be navigating them alone while also recovering from a serious injury.

Kelley Wolff Injury Attorneys | Austin Accident Lawyers represents construction accident victims in Austin and throughout Texas on a contingency fee basis — you pay nothing unless we recover for you. Call us at (512)-470-6068 to speak with our team, or contact us online to schedule a free consultation. You can also visit our Austin office at 17800 Hamilton Pool Rd Ste. 203, Austin, TX 78738, United States.

If you’ve been hurt on a construction site in 2026, the time to act is now.